Monday 26 November 2018

Updated TED talks schedule


 6 Dec         Ken Robinson Schools kill creativity (2006)
13 Dec        Alain deBotton    Atheism 2.0  (Jul 2011) 
20 Dec       Brett Hennig What if we replaced politicians with randomly selected people                              (2018)
 3 Jan         Hans Rosling The best stats you’ve ever seen (2006)

Sunday 18 November 2018

Vocabulary revision

Below is the wordlist with most of the vocabulary we have covered this term. Make sure you can use these phrases to talk about the issues and topics we have talked about in class.


Friday 26 October 2018

Reflections 5


Megyn Kelly, a host on an NBC morning programme, said on air, in a panel of exclusively white people, that she didn’t understand why children couldn’t wear blackface as part of their Halloween costumes. In other words, it is ok for a white person to paint their face black to pretend they are a black person. Her remark was interpreted as racist all over the States and widely criticised. She is likely to lose her job over this (albeit not without a multimillion-dollar compensation).
If you do not know the context, you could probably see nothing racist in painting your face to pretend you’re someone else. But it’s enough to look at the relevant Wikipedia page to see what connotations ‘blackface’ has in order to understand the outrage the comment triggered among black Americans. (“Blackface is a form of theatrical make-up used predominantly by non-black performers to represent a caricature of a black person. The practice gained popularity during the 19th century and contributed to the spread of racial stereotypes”)
On a few cable channels that covered this story, white hosts consistently turned to their black colleagues to ask for comment. As if white people don’t know if a remark is racist? And it turns out they were right. We don’t. As one of them explained – you don’t ask the attacker if what he did hurts the victim, you ask the victim. So you should ask a person of colour if a comment was racist, you should ask a gay person if someone’s words felt homophobic and you should ask a Jew whether a joke sounds antisemitic. Only the attacked have the right sensitivity to decide whether some words are harmless or offensive. It is not for Harvey Weinstein to decide if the women he invited to his hotel rooms under false pretences felt sexually abused. We have to ask the women!
We live in a relatively homogenic community of white Poles, just like Megyn Kelly probably lived in a white middle-class environment where casual racism goes undetected or seems innocent enough. What if, just like her, we lack the sensitivity necessary to see when we offend others? Especially others we are not very familiar with.

Thursday 18 October 2018

Article to read for Monday 22 Oct

Here is the article we'll discuss on Monday, 22 October (the whole class together). Make sure that you understand the words in bold.
Do animals have morals
And here is the link to the video referred to in the text of monkeys in India rescuing their mate.
Monkey Rescue

Monday 15 October 2018

Reflection 4


A teacher friend was running his first lesson with a new class and, while he was going through some organisational things, a student said „Shouldn’t you introduce yourself first?!”
This sounds vastly inappropriate to me. First, even if it was a breach of good manners not to introduce yourself to a new class, this remark is plain rude and not the way to correct anyone’s mistake (whoever this person is). Second, what has happened to respect and trust that we owe people who are supposed to teach us? The teacher may later turn out to be incompetent or unfair and then we can treat them accordingly. But during our first encounter the natural attitude should be positive expectations, not aggression.
This incident is also one of many examples of the general collapse of authorities. We are told that we are all experts and we do not need to respect and rely on other people’s knowledge and opinions. Even if these people have spent their entire lives studying an area of knowledge. For example, against the unanimous opinion of the medical community, we know better that vaccines can hurt our children even if this claim is based on some anecdotal evidence and a rigged study whose author admitted he had faked the results and was sentenced by a UK court.

Monday 8 October 2018

Reflection 3


A friend of mine spent her holidays in Switzerland. She lived in a friend’s flat and had first-hand experience of Swiss customs. It turns out each community has very strict rules regarding parties, guests, noise, recycling (you sort rubbish into about ten categories), the times when you can take a shower, flush the toilet or run the washing machine (not after 10 p.m.). If you break the rules, your neighbours can and will call the police. My friend was delighted with the clarity and precision of these rules and the order they imposed on people’s everyday lives. Well, I am not so sure…
The rules governing people’s coexistence in communities like blocks of flats or housing estates can’t be too oppressive and inflexible. What if I have a sick child who cries all night? Or food poisoning, which makes me use the toilet every ten minutes? Do I really have to wait till morning to flush it? Or can’t I have my eighteenth birthday party at home? It’s once in a lifetime after all!
House rules should be based on mutual respect and common sense. It should be obvious that we try not to disturb our neighbours with loud noise, nasty smells or other offensive stimuli. But we should be forgiven if, once in a while, we take a shower in the middle of the night because our child threw up on us.

Monday 1 October 2018

Reflection 2


A student asked me the same question that I had already answered a few minutes earlier. In another class another student asked about the meaning of the word that I had just spent two minutes explaining. Are they deaf? Or dumb? Or am I so boring that they can’t be bothered to pay attention?
If I optimistically assume that I am not the most boring teacher in the world, the root of this problem must be some attention issues. We can blame the Internet, smartphones, the fast pace of living and the incredible amount of (often completely unimportant) information we have to process every minute. It may be true that our brains have changed and now can’t focus on one thing for more than a few minutes. We need to be constantly entertained to pay attention. And the tragedy is that without deep focus and deliberate attention serious learning just won’t happen. In order to properly understand and/or remember something, we need to pay attention. So please let’s not waste more time on unnecessary explanations and clarifications – pull yourselves together and focus the first time round!

Monday 24 September 2018

Reflection 1


The other day I was travelling on the underground and I couldn’t help hearing a few people in my carriage talking on their phones. I was forced to listen to a girl chatting with a friend about their boyfriends, a man doing business on the phone (and possibly disclosing some confidential corporate info) and a woman planning a weekend away with someone.
Somehow these people found it acceptable to share their personal and professional lives with complete strangers. I find it difficult to understand on at least two levels. On the one hand, I don’t wish random people to know what I do at weekends and what I think about my boss (and what if one of the unwitting listeners happens t be my boss’s cousin?). Why on earth would anyone want to share such ins and outs of their life with strangers? On the other hand, I am not interested in knowing about random people’s love lives and shopping habits and I’d rather they kept them to themselves.
Privacy seems to be a thing of the past, which I find deeply disturbing.

Monday 3 September 2018

Welcome back!

I hope everybody's had good holidays and you are all ready to get back to work. 
This term your homework is going to involve, among other tasks, watching some selected TED talks. You are expected to:
1. watch the talk, preferably without subtitles, and definitely without translation
2. take notes concerning the main points the speaker made and other interesting facts or thoughts that caught your attention
3. put down key vocabulary and any collocations/idioms you found interesting
4. be ready to discuss the talk in class

Here is the viewing schedule (the dates refer to the classes in which we will discuss the talk): 


2b 2018 / 2019 – viewing schedule 1st term  Source: www.ted.com


20 Sep

1.      Amy Cuddy Your body language shapes who you are (2012)

27 Sep
2.      Barry Schwartz On the paradox of choice (2005)
4 Oct
3.      Kathryn Schulz on being wrong (2011)
11 Oct
4.      Dan Pink The puzzle of motivation (2009)
18 Oct
5.      Frans De Waal Moral behaviour in animals (2011)
25 Oct
6.      Celeste Headlee 10 ways to have a better conversation (2015) CANCELLED
8 Nov
7.      Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie The danger of a single story (2009)
15 Nov
8.      Ben Goldacre Battling bad science (2011)
22 Nov

9.       Dan Gilbert Why are we happy? (2004) 

10.  Brett Hennig What if we replaced politicians with randomly selected people (2018)
6 Dec
11.  Ken Robinson Schools kill creativity (2006)
13 Dec
12. Kelly McGonigal: How to make stress your friend (2013)
20 Dec
13.  Jonathan Haidt Can a divided America heal? (2016)
3 Jan
14.  Hans Rosling The best stats you’ve ever seen (2006)

Monday 4 June 2018

Group 2-BLOG questions

Dear Group 2. Here is the list of all the questions you were supposed to write answers to.
I' m waiting patiently till the 10 th of June.

1.Should money be spent on space exploration?
2. Why do people believe in supernatural things like magic, astrology etc. if they have science?
3.Who or what is to blame for obesity in today's world?
4.Is the fact that things last much shorter nowadays really so bad?
5.Would you like to spend a week in The Mandarin Oriental?
6.Would you consider going vegan?
7.What does it mean to be a real man in the 21st century?
8.A letter of application.
9.Does  art need to be beautiful?
10.What do we learn about modern society from "The Joneses"?

Please write overdue posts.
Regards
A.Rożyńska

Tuesday 8 May 2018

Dear Group 2
Watch the Columbian Exchange.Crash Course World History for Thursday 10th May.
Your English Teacher-Agnieszka Rożyńska :)

Friday 23 March 2018

Vocabulary revision

Below is the list of words and expressions we have covered so far this term. To make it even easier for you to recall and revise the vocabulary, each box represents a video you have watched. I assume you'll be ready with this after Easter.

giant
to trick sb into
an ingredient
quirky
coffee chains
to take (sth) over
to rot
gradually
fascist
independent
to drive sb out of business
high streets
see-through
to get sth / nothing in return
tax
consciousness-raising (exercise)
speed dial,
sexual assault
drag,
unconscious,
 fiancée, 
elevator ,
to suspend
to punch,
deeply rooted in,
masculinity,
peer culture,
sweep in under the carpet,
speak up,
to redefine

an incident
every now and then
whipped cream
to sink
to apply
to suspend
indignant
to his credit
to intend
to scoop
to float
skimmed milk
to come up with
to verify
to confirm
confirmation bias
divisive
in/at one stroke
to be/ go out of date
to go back (for) …  years
to congratulate sb on sth
to call sth into question
a fatal blow
to be faced with / to face sth
to orbit
to be for the chop
gravity
to put sth to the vote
spherical
a dwarf
exquisite
fleeting (beauty)
don’t be fooled
a blight on
a constant reminder of
a throwaway society
landfill
take years to do sth
to decompose
to hoard sth
tend to.
to catch up with sb
 charge
take sth for granted
to alter
icon
disposable
a handkerchief
overseas
wealthy
top notch
quintessential
Middle Eastern
to oversee
to look immaculate
to pick sb up
to drop sb off
a parking bay
a chauffeur
temporary
to extend
to renew
to move up the career ladder
arrogant
a shift
cultural awareness
a molecule
a cell
to replicate
to diversify
a descendant
to stiffen
an internal rod
segments
hard protective skin
rigid(ity)
to  venture
meanwhile
to gulp air
fleshy
scaly skin,
to exterminate
vacant
insulated
algae
sponges
amphibians
reptiles
mammals 
diabetes
heart disease
obesity
carbohydrates
taste buds
flavours
bitter
sour
unripe,
to crave sth / cravings
to domesticate sth
on a large scale
to have a sweet tooth
variety

Wednesday 21 March 2018

Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower

Watch this interview with Christopher Wylie, who describes the practices of Cambridge Analytica, a company involved in data gathering and analysis, as well as political campaigns. The interview is conducted by Carole Cadwalladr, a journalist who uncovered the scandal.
Cambridge Analytica Files

Tuesday 13 March 2018

"The Tree of Life" task


DAVID ATTENBOROUGH   “The Tree Of Life”


Answer the questions 1-5. If possible, use the words below in your answers.
1.      What are the characteristics of these groups of organisms: algae, sponges, insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals?
2.      How are these organisms related in the process of evolution?
3.      How can the process of evolution explain the following: the birds’ wings, amphibians’ legs, birds’ feathers, skulls and backbones?
4.      What happened on earth
a) 450 mln years ago?
b) 375 mln years ago?
c) 65 mln?
5.   Why did mammals manage to dominate the Earth?


a molecule
a cell
to replicate
to diversify
a descendant
to stiffen
an internal rod
segments
hard protective skin
rigid(ity)
to  venture
meanwhile
to gulp air
fleshy
scaly skin,
to exterminate
vacant
insulated

Monday 29 January 2018

Viewing schedule for the spring term

Below is your viewing schedule for the next term. For each video, do the following:

1. Watch the video as many times as you need to understand. If necessary, check the words and facts you don't know. Try not to use the 'subtitles' function if possible!
2. In your notebooktake notes about things you have learned from the video and put down key words and interesting expressions. Do this on your own! Don't copy the text from anywhere or ask anyone for extensive help.
3. Get ready to report on the content of the video in class and to discuss the issues raised in the film.
4. After the lesson in which we discuss the video, on your blog, answer the question asked by the teacher. Do it  in one paragraph of 80 - 100 words.



video to watch
to be discussed on
1          
Why is Pluto not a planet? BBC News https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIk29MnzZWA
6 Feb
2          
Is Sugar a Drug?
13 Feb
3          
Neil Degrasse Tyson - The scientific method  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FvSXI2iBcA
20 Feb
4          
Will plastic bags go out of fashion? BBC News
27 Feb
5          
6 Mar
6          
David Attenborough Tree of Life video HD https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6IrUUDboZo
David Attenborough on Darwin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uz7U4k522Pg
13 Mar
7          
Jackson Katz: The Macho Paradox https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP7g0Kn7WrY
20 Mar
8          

27 Mar
9          
What If The World Became Vegan? - Earth Unplugged https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytFwytWK1Bw
10 Apr
10      
BBC Modern Masters 1of4 -Andy Warhol (59 min)
17 Apr
11      
24 Apr
12      
The Columbian Exchange: Crash Course World History #23 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQPA5oNpfM4
10 May